Last year an author released a book that was labeled as contemporary romance. It was part of a long running series and this character's book was much anticipated. Only...it wasn't a contemporary. The author decided to make it a time-travel/futuristic/sci-fi blend. Readers were pretty upset about it - rightly so, IMO. The author's response was 1) I have to do what my muse tells me to and 2) it's really my publisher's fault for labeling this wrong. She took a lot of heat for both her response and for the book itself. Eventually the dust settled and most people - myself included - forgot all about it.
Now the author has a new book coming out. The heroine is an author. And it just so happens her last book garnered a lot of controversy for an unexpected plot twist. The heroine's reaction to the controversy was exactly what our author's reaction was. It was pretty much right down the line the same. The author didn't deviate even a little between her heroine's situation and her real life one.
I have to be honest, the whole thing highly offended me. It felt like the author just had to get the last word in, and since she couldn't do it in real life she did it for pretend, in her book. Now, I know it's possible that it's all just a big fat coincidence, but it feels like sour grapes. Why write a book with an author character who writes the same genre as you and dealt with the same bad reviews for the same plot twist, if it's not sour grapes?
What say you? Should the author have brought it to her book? Coincidence or Sour Grapes? Share this post!